Who criticized Jasprit Bumrah’s workload management and why?

Former selector Sandeep Patil called it ‘nonsense,’ stating modern players should be fit enough to play unless genuinely injured and questioned physio priority over selectors and captain.

What examples did Patil use to emphasize his point?

He recalled how legends like Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Dev played through injuries and long matches, arguing that focus should be on dedication to national duty.

Was Bumrah’s absence in two Tests due to injury or workload management?

Initially presented as a workload plan, the absence in the 5th Test was later confirmed to be due to a knee injury, though workload management had been announced publicly beforehand.

Workload Management Is Nonsense": Sandeep Patil Slams Bumrah's Selective Test Plan

“Workload Management Is Nonsense”: Sandeep Patil Slams Bumrah’s Selective Test Plan

Former India cricketer and ex-selector Sandeep Patil strongly criticised the concept of workload-based selection after Jasprit Bumrah was rested for two Tests during the England tour. Patil rejected the approach outright, calling it “nonsense” and invoking the playing ethic of past greats.

Table of Contents

Patil’s Criticism Explained
Examples from Cricketing Legends
Reality Behind Bumrah’s Absence
Summary Table
FAQs

Patil’s Criticism Explained

Patil questioned whether modern cricket has placed too much power in the hands of physiotherapists, asking: “Is the physio more important than the captain, the head coach?” He asserted that players should either be fit or not—without extra rotations or rest-based selections.citeturn0search13

Examples from Cricketing Legends

He evoked memories of Sunil Gavaskar, who batted all five days, and Kapil Dev, who bowled persistently, regardless of conditions or fatigue. Patil recalled even playing soon after a head injury in 1981—emphasising sacrifice over excusethrowing.

Reality Behind Bumrah’s Absence

While management promoted a workload plan—resting Bumrah in two of the five Tests—reports later confirmed that his absence in the fifth Test was due to a knee injury, not strategic override.

Summary Table

Aspect	Detail
Critic	Sandeep Patil, former BCCI selector
Criticism	Workload management is “nonsense”—players should play unless truly unfit
Legend References	Gavaskar batted 5 days, Kapil bowled often, Patil played post-head injury
Bumrah’s Rest Reason	Initially framed as workload; later attributed to knee injury

FAQs

Who criticized Bumrah’s workload management and why?

Sandeep Patil labelled it “nonsense,” arguing players should either be fit or not and warned against physio-driven selection decisions.

What examples did Patil use to make his point?

He recalled cricketers like Gavaskar and Kapil Dev playing through injuries as examples of true national duty ethos.

Was Bumrah rested for workload, or did he have an injury?

While workload was stated publicly, he was ruled out of the fifth Test due to a knee injury, raising questions about consistency in messaging.

Disclaimer: This article is based on verified statements and news reporting. Please verify independently before drawing conclusions.

Thank you for visiting Cricket In Focus! Explore more in our Test, India, and Latest Cricket Updates sections.

Discover more from Cricket In Focus

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.