Ravindra Jadeja’s Dismissal Sparks Uproar as Fans Question Harry Brook Catch
Day 2 at Old Trafford saw India suffering another setback when veteran all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja edged an away-swinger from Jofra Archer to second slip. England’s Harry Brook completed a low, diving catch that ignited controversy, with fans accusing him of grounding the ball and questioning why there was no referral made to the third umpire.
The Catch Incident
In the 85th over, Jadeja played an away-moving delivery from Archer that carried to second slip. Brook, diving to his right, appeared to complete the catch as he landed near the turf. The on-field umpire immediately signalled out, and no review was requested, despite some TV replays appearing to show slight contact between the ball and the ground.
Fans’ Reaction & Replay Debate
Fans expressed their displeasure on social media, questioning both the legitimacy of the catch and the decision not to call for a replay. On X (formerly Twitter), one fan asked “Why no replay?”, while another accused Brook of outright cheating:
“This has been given out. Nice one ECB. Nasser Hussain must be proud.”
“Cheating mode #ENGvIND”
The uproar highlights renewed scrutiny over umpiring decisions and the balance between on-field calls and broadcast replays.
Impact on India’s Innings
Jadeja’s wicket at 20 off 40 balls stalled India’s middle-order fightback. Prior to his dismissal, India had weathered England’s opening spell with relative stability. However, the breakthrough energised England’s bowlers and shifted momentum significantly in their favour. The pressure on India deepened as a result.
Rules & Umpire Protocol
Under ICC rules, a catch that is close to the ground but taken cleanly can stand unless there is clear evidence of grounding. The on-field umpire’s call often holds sway unless a captain challenges via DRS. In this instance, England chose not to refer, and the umpires upheld the original decision. However, broadcasters showing replay-like angles usually prompt viewer confusion when no review is initiated.
Historical Context of Similar Catches
Controversial catches are nothing new. In 2019, India’s Shreyas Iyer survived a boundary catch that appeared grounded, but the no-review norm left the decision unchanged. Similarly, England’s Ben Stokes faced scrutiny for a catch at Lord’s in 2018. Such incidents reveal how close-run decisions often depend on on-field calls and team review choices.
Summary Table
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Batsman | Ravindra Jadeja – 20 off 40 |
| Bowler | Jofra Archer (England) |
| Catcher | Harry Brook at second slip |
| Controversy | Alleged grounding; no third umpire referral |
| Impact | Shifted momentum to England |
Disclaimer: This article is based on information compiled from online sources. Please verify independently before making any decisions based on it.
Thank you for visiting Cricket In Focus! Explore more in our Test, India, and Latest Cricket Updates sections.
Discover more from Cricket In Focus
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
